16 Comments
User's avatar
Steghorn21's avatar

What will Netanyahu do now? Attention switches back to his court case. Will he accept reality or will he, Gvir and Smotrich attack anyway knowing (they hope) that Uncle Schmuel will bail them out?

Mike richards's avatar

There’s no anticipating sociopathic thinking using non-sociopathic minds.

Steghorn21's avatar

True, Mike. It's a big fault of mine.

Neural Foundry's avatar

Sharp analysis on the casualty calculus changing everything. The idea that Taiwan might see Xi as genial enough to come to terms with is pretty sobering when you consider how much US policy banks on cross-strait tensions staying frozen. I've noticed even mainstream outlets quietly dropping the 'defend Taiwan at all costs' rethoric lately. Once other countries realize they can impose costs that Trump politically can't absrob, the whole deterrence model collapses.

Its Just Me's avatar

From ZeroHedge.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/lindsey-drowns-sorrows-after-trump-refrained-iran-attack-no-guarantees

In the the last sentence, Graham uttered words to the effect that he hoped the regime's days were numbered. I immediately got excited thinking that he meant that he wouldn't run for reelection.

Then reality set in. LOL.

Todd E Smekens's avatar

Yep, as you mentioned in the comment section, what happened to make Trump back down is that he received a message from Russia. Vladimir yanked on Trump's leash and said, "Don't attack Iran!"

As any well-trained dog would do, he backed down. ;)

ML's avatar

But as usual, Trump pushed things to their max before heeding Vladimir’s message…must have been a fearsome warning.

johnycomelately's avatar

I wonder if Turkey shut down Azerbaijan as a staging point this time. If something happens to Erdogan’s health in the next few months we’ll definitely know.

ML's avatar

Incredible. Trump continuously threatening a strike on Iran, then gets confronted by some cold hard facts; yet, all the while Putin mediates for restraint. Who is the peace president now?

Manul's avatar

I DON'T BELIEVE HIM!

This is the tactic he played last time.

https://x.com/mtracey/status/2011865202438902219?s=20

Robert Ritchie's avatar

Fair enough. But when he attacks next, he'll likely limit himself to stand-off missile bombardment, declare victory, and move on. Now that the CIA and Mossad have burned through their MEK jihadists, Baluchis/Kurds and criminal riff-raff in their failed coup, it's about all he can do without taking casualties.

Mark Wauck's avatar

Problem. Bases aren't standoff weapons--they're subject to retaliatory strikes. And if the bases are abandoned, your ability to launch standoff strikes becomes more limited, since those bases have been used for surveillance purposes.

Robert Ritchie's avatar

I wasn't even considering the bases! Mainly because not a single US base can fire Tomahawks, the missile of choice. ;)

Martina Lauer's avatar

The US tried a Libyan play book "to save lives" and failed.

Mark Wauck's avatar

And, of course, what does this mean for the future of US bases in the region? Iran threatened to attack countries that host US bases.