Brief Update On The Clinton Dossier
Since the link to Kim Strassel’s original WSJ article—which I provided last night—is now behind their pay wall, here’s a link to a repub of the article at the NYPost:
Inside the Clinton dossier and the con behind the Russiagate scandal
It’s always important to get descriptive language and terminology right. The correct linguistic framing of events can be decisive for public perception. So Strassel does us a real favor by getting this “dossier” matter right:
The nation argued for five years over the infamous Steele dossier, the document on which the FBI relied to investigate Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. It should have been called the Clinton dossier.
As I noted last night, Quick Flag: The Clinton Dossier, Strassel’s article also has value because of its focus on Chuck Dolan, the long time Clinton operative who may be considered the true originator of the Clinton Dossier:
The article is interesting because it focuses mostly on Charles “Chuck” Dolan, who has been under the radar for the last five years. Strassel fleshes out the portrait of Dolan in a readable and quotable way.
In addition, there’s a NYT article that discusses the Danchenko indictment (and, therefore, Dolan). It has a predictably disinformative slant, but may be worth a critical read:
Authorities Arrest Analyst Who Contributed to Steele Dossier
If that link doesn’t work, try this one: https://archive.vn/RJaWI
Where are those WaPo and Times reporters at now with their breathless reporting on what we all now know was a Clinton Campaign political hit job? Their names should be published as co-conspirators in the biggest political scam in the nation's history. And the real embarrassment for them should be that it was the democrats colluding with Russians. Imagine that. But hey, they did their part in the scheme...
>> https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1457418261830815745 <<
Technofog points out the info in Danchenko indictment indicates Mueller's Goons appear to have known Dolan was a source when they questioned Danchenko in mid June 2017, specifically asking him about Dolan.
Thus, Mueller knew BEFORE submitting the final renewal of the Carter Page FISA that one of the Dossier sources was a partisan Democrat advisor to Hillary's campaign, and that Danchenko had been lying about his sources.
Mueller Goon's did not include this in the final renewal application, nor notified the court that Danchenko was a liar, and had used info from a partisan Hillary supporter in the Dossier material, which they were obligated to do under the local FISA court rules.
If Durham wants to go after Mueller's Goon's, he's got plenty of grounds to thoroughly sniff their collective underwear drawers.