By which time, no doubt, there will be a new variant that will have or will be about to become dominant over the Ominous Omicron, which is sweeping the field of Dread Delta. The notion of playing ‘vaccine’ whackamole’ with a respiratory virus was always madness from any rational scientific standpoint—the virus will always win. That’s not rocket science—it’s simple common sense that was apparent to any legitimate scientist.
That being the case, we are left to ponder the implications of all this. If this policy was always irrational and always doomed to fail, what was the point of the exercise in the first place? What was the point of inducing mass psychosis in the population, with harmful lockdowns, theatrical but ineffective prophylactic measures, and coerced injections of experimental substances that are known to be wildly harmful—certainly in comparison to all past vaccines? I can think of no benign or reassuring explanation, only nefarious explanations. Starting with the Great Reset and removing Trump.
Here’s a nurse laying it on the line for two minutes (h/t my Dutch friend):
"EVERYONE WHO DIED OF COVID IN HOSPITAL SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO HAVE BEEN MURDERED"
Extreme? Anyone who thinks the nurse is expressing an extreme view needs to also consider the news from Monday, when Pfizer CEO Bourla acknowledged: 1) that two injections may offer no protection at all; 2) three injections may offer “reasonable” protection; but 3) he’s not too keen on going for a fourth.
What does he know? And what do the EU regulators know about the harm to the immune system caused by repeat ‘boosts’? Last nights news is already getting stale.
And now this morning Alex Berenson is reporting that the WHO is also rejecting boosts—incredibly, however, they want varant-specific injections. But those will always be after-the-fact. Playing catch-up never works in this kind of game, which is unmistakably revealing its CYA nature:
2 hr ago
Now the World Health Organization has waved the white flag on Covid vaccine boosters too.
WHO released a statement about Covid vaccines yesterday. It’s filled with the usual public health jargon and ass-covering, but one line stands out:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
It’s over, people.
Berenson asks the obvious question: Why would anyone in their right mind take the boost injections that are being urged—even mandated—on one and all? And as we saw yesterday—in comic fashion—at The Atlantic, the majority of people are saying, in effect: One and done. They caught on to the scam, and now the regulators are having to backhandedly admit to it.
But what a scam! Listen to the nurse again, consider the carnage—detailed in horrific yet under-reported statistical form at VAERS—the excess mortality now being reported in multiple countries since the mass injections. Then consider the revelations from Project Veritas that show that the DoD knew all along that Ivermectin and HCQ were highly effective as early treatment—yet effective treatments were essentially banned, as they still, essentially, are. Here is a comment from CTH that lays that part out in convenient form:
asdfasdf
Here is the direct link to the bombshell DoD Inspector General report obtained by Project Veritas.
Including such highlights as …
– Ivermectin has been known by the government to be ‘curative’ during ‘all phases’ of COVID-19 illness since April 2020
– Someone at the DoD put Eco Health’s unclassified proposal on a classified network drive (presumably so it wouldn’t show up in FOIA requests)
– the DoD says SARS-CoV-2 begins spreading in August 2019, months before previously acknowledged
And so much more!
Veritas leaked DoD report to the Inspector General (PDF):
https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/2mVob3c1aDd8CNvVnyei6n/95af7dbfd2958d4c2b8494048b4889b5/JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf
Berenson concludes with some pointed observations:
At most, future Covid vaccinations will look a lot like current influenza vaccinations (and NOT the other way around). They’ll be cooked up annually and handed out at the beginning of the winter season. They won’t do much, and no one will expect them to.
…
The war is over. The (mRNA) vaccines lost. The only question is when how many more people will be harmed before American public health authorities announce their surrender.
No, the war won’t be over without trials and payback.
Ok class, a show of hands for who thinks that we will ever get the kind of top to bottom, azz kicking, prosecutions, and Nuremberg trials for all of the government and corporate people who knowingly participated in this crime against humanity from ANY elected politician in DC? Does anyone have any confidence that the cleansing of this level and breadth of evil can be accomplished by our existing Constitutional order? I think the Founders would agree that their design is wholly inadequate for our present crisis, for rooting out a criminal thugocracy. We will have to clean the slate and start again.
Once IVM and HCQ are determined to be effective treatments, the rationale, i.e. the legal underpinning the EUAs for the vax go away--at least that is how I understand the process (but I am not a gov official, I do not play one on TV, and did not stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night--so, what do I know?).
Without the EUA legal foundation--there is no alternative--then the vax goes away.
So too, any discussion about mandates.
Perhaps the SCOTUS is hoping the bottom falls out so it will not have to make a decision on the 'stay.'