Boom! Malone Goes THERE, THERE, And THERE
Dr. Robert Malone did a 45 minute or so interview with Stew Peters yesterday that’s a real bombshell. I can’t embed Rumble, so I’ve done one of my edited transcripts—it’s that good and important. In what follows, Malone’s remarks are inside quotation marks. It’s not a full transcript, and it’s edited for readability, but it gives a lot of what he had to say, which runs the gamut of Covid Regime topics. The interview’s substance begins with the stunning statements by the insurance company CEO.
What About The Excess Deaths?
STEW PETERS: Has the government pulled off a Psy-Op against its own people?
"It sure looks that way."
"Remember, this isn't just any CEO of any insurance company. They're a $100 billion dollar fund."
“There's a huge number of deaths and adverse that are linked to the injections. We can quibble about the degree of underreporting, but we know the government is manipulating figures. The degree of manipulation is up for debate, but it's major.”
"We've known for a long time that the truth will come out. Data will come out. And the people who will see it are exactly this cohort of people--insurance actuaries. They have their finger on the pulse of America because it's their business. They're business is showing a tsunami of new charges, and they're gonna hafta up their rates."
"American mortality per million of population is among the worst in the world."
"We have had a human catastrophe of death and disease."
"He [Davison] is also saying they're also seeing a huge surge in disability claims."
"This is an ongoing medical catastrophe the likes of which the world has never seen, and certainly the United States insurance industry has never seen--and somebody has to be held accountable for this."
US Deep State’s Role
STEW PETERS: Who is that? How directly involved is the CCP?
"The documents are quite strong--and it's [funding of CCP Wuhan research] still going on."
"The Risk Mitigation Branch [at DoD] are the guys ... they're still pouring money into the Wuhan labs. They believe that by subsidizing that Wuhan lab they're incentivizing the scientists there to not do bad stuff. It is grossly naive, but the money is still flowing."
STEW PETERS: What was your fellowship at Harvard in?
"Global Clinical Research, and that fellowship was partially funded by CCP as well as KSA.
STEW PETERS: How closely does DoD and CIA work with Harvard?
"Quite closely. And [Johns] Hopkins. It was the Hopkins-CIA shop that held these planning sessions under the funding of the World Economic Forum [WEF] and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. We do have a Deep State Problem here. I'm sorry--there's no better word for it. [Discusses the deliberate circumvention of Trump's order to make HCQ available for treatment.]"
STEW PETERS: How closely does the CCP work directly with Harvard?
"[Laughs] Like hand in glove. It's like saying, How closely was Jeffrey Epstein embedded in all of this, including at Harvard and MIT? Tight as a tick."
"Harvard based New England Journal of Medicine [NEJM] is compromised."
[Quotes head of NEJM saying we won't know effects of injections on children until we inject them.] "These statements are the basis for me saying that our government is lawless. Completely disregarded the norms and standards of clinical research and bio-ethics--they don't care."
Who Should Get Injected?
STEW PETERS: Do you know why anyone in any age group should take these shots right now?
[Long explanation of methodology, including PCR overstatements and VAERS underreporting and how to come up with a realistic risk assessment.] "The data on mortality is a hot mess. But, if you run the numbers for risk assessment you end up, from birth to death--to 80 years old--showing that the risk-benefit analysis is such that you will have more morbidity and mortality associated with the jab than you have with the disease. And that's WITH the biased denominator consequent to the overdiagnosis through PCR that the government has incentivized."
"So, the answer is, right now--depending on the data slice you take, and the assumptions you make--for a wide spectrum of those assumptions there is no justification in any age cohort for the genetic vaccines. That is what I see in the data."
STEW PETERS: There's different messaging coming out of the UK, out of New Zealand--this woman attended Klaus Schwab's college for the global elites or whatever it's called ...
"As did Trudeau, as did Macron [and also Newsom and Butthead] ..."
STEW PETERS: And so there're Psy-Ops happening all over ...
"So here's the game. The way it's playing is that the CIA is handling the psy-ops outside of the US borders and they're equivalent colleagues over in the UK [presumably MI6] are managing the psy-ops against the United States."
STEW PETERS: You mentioned that you received a call from the CIA in Wuhan early in 2020. What was that about?
"It wasn't 'early in 2020,' it was January 4th from Michael Callahan. Michael Callahan uses his Harvard appointment as his cover. Anybody who wants to look this up, just 'google' 'unlimited hangout and michael callahan' and you will get an amazing data dump. I've been collaborating with Michael for years, I've co-published with him, I've know exactly what he was. As I say in Bobby's [Kennedy] book, he [Callahan] was introduced to me by another CIA agent who was my business partner back in the day. He had retired. I was told by a GS-15 that I have known practically since he was in diapers, he's from Australia, he is chief science officer of [?], I've known him since he was an early post-doc in Maryland. He called me and said, basically, these are not the drones you're looking for. He said, 'Michael Callahan was not in Wuhan. He was lying. Stop saying these things. We had nobody in Wuhan at the time.' That was told to me directly. It was as explicit a 'shut-up' as I have ever seen or heard."
Read More20 MINUTE READ
Michael Callahan's career began in USAID and in the bioweapons labs of the former Soviet Union, advancing the agenda of the global bioweapons and pharmaceutical cartels. He would take what he learned there to execute a massive expansion of DARPA's biodefense portfolio and today finds himself squarely in the center of the origins of the coronavirus pandemic.
JULY 31, 2020
"Unfortunately, Michael blabbed to Science Magazine about how important he was. For some reason he got it in his mind that [he could score a big success by taking credit for Famotidine [?]], claiming Famotidine had been discovered by him working with Chinese scientists in Wuhan and data mining a database that didn't exist at the time before he scooted out of Wuhan as the quarantine dropped at the end of the Chinese New Year. Michael was in Wuhan in the 4th Quarter of 2019. I speculate--Michael is our senior bio-warfare expert. Full stop. He was an adviser to Obama. He was an adviser to Trump. He was an adviser to prior presidents. He is frequently in the White House. We scoot him all over the world and he drops into outbreaks all over the world. That's what he does. That's what he's been doing for years. He ran the DARPA projects on Gain of Function research. You can look it all up. It's all documented."
"So, Michael called me on January 4th and told me I needed to get my team spun up because we have a virus outbreak that's a problem."
"I think that the data strongly suggests that it was a laboratory creation, a gain of function research creation. We have so much of a paper trail. Gain of function research is classified because it's considered dual-function research--that's why you can't find the budgets. That means it's something that can be used for weaponization purposes or it can be used for fundamental research and discovery. What we have here is something that appears to have been passaged in mice that were 'humanized.' The data on that are pretty well developed. The only thing that I don't have clear in my mind is [was it a deliberate release or something else]."
“Here's a fun fact. Have you ever heard of RSV? Major cause of pediatric death, particularly in the premature infant population. RSV didn't exist in the human population as of 1950. It emerged in the mid 50s consequent to a lab leak from a laboratory in Silver Springs, MD, when it jumped from a non-human primate population into their handlers. This is a problem that we've known about for almost a century. There is a cohort of scientists who believe that they are so privileged and they are so smart and so entitled that they don't have to follow the rules. And they know what they're doing better than the bureaucrats that are providing oversight for their experiments. And they feel entitled to just go ahead and do stuff. I have experienced this directly--it's part of why I left UC Davis. I had objected to research being done by a more senior scientist that was making chimeras between the simian version of the AIDS virus and various human cytokines to create a virus that would be more pathogenic to serve as a better non-human primate model. He didn't get appropriate regulatory oversight from the university on this. These people think that they're entitled to mess around with nature."
How Do The Vaccines Cause Harm?
STEW PETERS: What are the top three ways that these vaccines injure or disable or kill people?
"Number one: blood clots, blood clots, blood clots. In all their various forms--acute and auto-immune. Blood clots may be what's driving the cardio-toxicity and the central nervous system toxicity."
"Second point. Spike. Spike has two [?] mutations in the vaccine form, but it retains the full ACE2 binding site intact--just like the live virus. Spike activates ACE2. ACE2 triggers a contraction in cells like pericytes [?]. Who cares? Pericytes are the small smooth muscle cells that control the blood flow through your microvasculature. What happens when microvasculature closes off? The coagulation cascade gets triggered and we call that microcoagulopathy blood clots. That means that the spike protein itself is able to trigger vacular constriction in the small vessels of your body. It travels all over your body. So we have a variety of issues with the brain. These are strokes. We have loss of blood-brain barrier integrity associated with spike--we know this from the laboratory. So there are a number of things associated with the brain. Then there's the damage to heart and the coagulation system. And, of course, microcoagulopathy can affect any organ in your body--that's one of the things that's revealed by the autopsy report."
"Then we have the emerging evidence we talked about earlier when we were talking about cancers of, alterations of the immune system function. We don't know how long that persists, but we absolutely know this happens."
"Then we have the big kahuna--reproductive toxicology. One of the biggest events noted in VAERS is alteration of menses. And this includes in the pediatric cohort, because any girl past the age of puberty is experiencing their menstrual cycle with all the things associated with it. What is fascinating about this is, not only is there a HUGE cohort of women reporting this of reproductive age, but you're having post menopausal women reporting bleeding. Who cares? What does it amount to? It's just menstruation, y'know? Well, it affects reproductive fertility for sure, but the thing that's most worrisome to me is that the thing that controls menstruation is the ovary. Your daughters are born with all of the eggs that they will ever have in their ovary at the time of birth. Your kids that are being vaccinated with any of these lipid vaccines--which we know from the little bit of data that we were allowed to see, from the Pfizer FOIAedreport from Japan--these lipids go to the ovary. So we have synthetic positively charged fats that stick to the ovary for some reason, and we have this whole cascade of [?] characteristic of adverse events, that all point to alterations in ovarian biology. That is a big worry."
What’s The Big Picture End Game?
"I believe strongly now that what we are seeing is the signs of the decades long effort by entrenched oligarchic interests to move towards a single world government which is being structured under the World Economic Forum and which has coopted leadership in Western nations across the world and is now empowered by a small group of trans-national investment funds--Blackrock and Vanguard being among the more notable, State Street also. Blackrock is managing funds that exceed the total net funds in the major bank of the People's Republic of China. That's what I think we're seeing--is the heavy hand and footprint of this decades long effort to implement a one world government. If you want to see more about that, some Canadians sent me a link for the strategic planning document for the World Economic Forum. It lists all of their policy positions and how it should be implemented and coordinated globally. This is not crazy conspiracy talk--it's their own web site, and you can find it on my Gettert account. I posted it yesterday. Make your own assessment.”