Larry Johnson does us all a favor today by providing a post that you can send to gullible friends and relatives who have been taken in by Israeli atrocity porn. I don’t say “propaganda,” because this stuff give “propaganda” a bad name. LJ calls it simply “lies”, which is the white bread name for it:
LJ himself had to deal with a brother in law who seems to have been under the odd impression that Israeli accounts—babies beheaded, babies baked in ovens, women raped while being dismembered, or as corpses—were somehow to be believed. Like he’d never heard of hasbara. Obviously these lurid—and false accounts—speaks eloquently to the mentality of the concocters as well as to those who can’t get enough of it. The pervo sex angle is just so typical of the effort to demonize the other. I recommend LJ’s post highly for it’s debunking, which relies on the work of reputable journalists. Without attempting to steal LJ’s thunder, I can’t resist listing two items as a sneak preview:
Israeli Lt. Col. Golan Vach suggests his tanks killed at least 19 Israelis, including 8 children, in one strike on 10/7
During this presser on 10/14 in front of a destroyed kibbutz home (resembling the Pessi Cohen home in Kibbutz Beeri), Vach said, "This destruction is due to the attack by our tanks. Since these houses were seized by Hamas, we had to reclaim the entire settlement. It wouldn't have been possible without tanks... No one survived in this house."
Vach also appeared to backpedal when pressed on his previous comments claiming to have evidence of babies beheaded by Hamas.
That’s just one house. Obviously a large group of Israelis had been gathered in that one house, but that was not an isolated episode. Survivors of the music concert have also recounted being attacked indiscriminately by Israeli helicopter gunships—there are photos of huge numbers of burned out cars, that were indiscriminately destroyed by the IOF. With the occupants.
Then there’s this example, which is a recurrent theme in Israeli propaganda:
The GrayZone reported today that the Washington Post quietly removed a false claim attributed to Israel’s Defense Minister in a November 12th “exclusive”:
November 12 and promoted as a Washington Post “exclusive,” Gallant is quoted as telling the outlet: “We know from interrogations that Hamas came in with detailed plans of their attack, including which commander should rape which soldiers in different places.”
Turns out Gallant was unwilling to stand behind his claim and the Washington Post issued this “correction”:
“A previous version of this article included a quote from Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant that was not authorized for publication. The quote has been removed.”
Odd language. It certainly suggests he said it but probably realized that it was a lie that would be easily exposed.
Well. This is an interesting investigative technique. Appeal to the general public to share their weird fantasies (h/t Aaron Maté):
But, then, what would you do if this were the kind of stuff you were trying to peddle as abuse, as “pure evil” (follow link for brief video)?
Kid did not gave Mia candy.
Moving on. Did you hear the one about how the US and Israel didn’t know nuthin’ about the terror attack in Iran? The same people who told us that thigh slapper figured they needed to come up with a more believable story, so …
So ... given the long-known fact that ISIS is a US/Israeli proxy, what conclusions logically follow from this report?
Quote
Military Eye @MilitaryEye
ISIS claimed responsibility for the terrorist attack in Kerman
And John Kirby says Hamas still has a “significant force profile” in Gaza.
Guilt by association, some might claim? Well, the nuns did warn us against having “bad companions”. Megatron_ron is having a field day:
EPSTEIN'S LIST:
Alan Dershowitz, the champion of the Epstein's List, mentioned 137 times:
"I want to have a list of all the radical feminists who are pushing hard to get the names from the Epstein list revealed.
I want to know how many of them have actually condemned Hamas for the rapes."
EPSTEIN'S LIST:
Donald Trump is clean.
He is NOT on the list.
EPSTEIN'S LIST:
Reports, that Ehud Barak, former Israeli Prime Minister, is the main organizer together with Epstein in the sex trade of children.
So the rumors that the Mossad is behind the whole Epstein operation are true. That is why the Zionists hold America in their hands.
For the fake community note:
Photos of Ehud Barak, former Israeli Prime Minister, as he seemingly enters and leaves Jeffery Epstein's Manhattan mansion in 2016. Plus very good explanation of his involvement you can find here:
https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1742779874824061159?t=K9ick6b0Pzr2b0dTRJoI9Q&s=19…
Epstein List:
Woman says Epstein forced her to have sex with former israeli PM Barak
Court filings by Alan Dershowitz revealed that a woman had named former prime minister Ehud Barak as one of several important men she was forced to have sex with by Jeffrey Epstein.
Somebody needs to give Netanyahu a clue:
Epstein-linked lawyer tipped to defend Israel at The Hague According to reports, Benjamin Netanyahu has sought suspected paedophile Alan Dershowitz to defend Israel in the upcoming hearing at the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
Useful reminder that this isn’t all just rumors:
Matt Kennard @kennardmatt
"I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone."
Alexander Acosta, the former US attorney in Miami, on why he cut Jeffrey Epstein a sweetheart non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007.
The deal saw Epstein serve just 15 months in jail for child sex offences.

10:17 AM · Jan 4, 2024
Hey, it’s just a hat. But it is the wierdest damned thing about security cameras in re Jeff and his co-conspirators. Bluto Barr knows all about that:
Jean-Luc Brunel, a co-conspirator of Jeffery Epstein, was found hanged in his prison cell, where the security cameras were not working. He is pictured here on Epstein's private island wearing a hat which reads "Israel Army."
Neither Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu nor Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov are named as clients or associates in the newly unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court documents.
Letting Bill Clinton's name out was also interesting. I wonder if it was Team Obama sending a little warning to Hillary in case she decides to jump in the election?
So... how do we actually know that Isis is a US proxy?
I know we trained the people who became al Qaeda to confront Russia in Afghanistan.
And I know that Isis arose from the power vacuum that resulted from toppling Saddam Hussein.
I've also heard, but not seen conclusive evidence, that we were effectively allied with both in Syria. But this could be a strange bedfellows situation, not specifically an alliance.
I'm not saying we don't have responsibility for what we created or caused to be created. But identifying them as proxies takes it to a different level, needs more proof.