About The Bucha 'Reported' Atrocities
Over the last decade or so many Americans have become accustomed going to UK newspapers for news about the US—news that somehow never makes it to US mainstream media outlets, which increasingly are simply stenographers for the Liberal/Prog Establishment and the Deep State. However, it should not be a surprise to learn that UK media are also controlled assets of the British Intel Community. During the Russian special operation in Ukraine it has become very apparent that MI6 is taking the lead in the propaganda front of America’s (and the UK’s) three front proxy war against Russia. Even a casual observer of the news feeds has to notice that virtually all of the anti-Russian claims—wildly over optimistic assessments, claims of Putin’s mental decline and or desperation, fake news of atrocities and casualties, mislabeling of photos, etc.—appear first in British media outlets.
This has also happened in the case of the “reported”—i.e., unverified—Russian atrocities in Bucha. A few tweets illustrate the very dodgy character of this narrative. It took no less than two days, maybe longer, of reoccupation of Bucha by Ukraine for the narrative to develop. Weird, huh?
No forensic findings—only narrative designed to prolong and increase sanctions. Ultimate goal? Probably to hold wavering NATO countries in line:
Why would Americans trust those feeding us a narrative, without basic fact checking? We don’t trust them on domestic affairs, have they suddenly become trustworthy when they’re attempting to foment something approach a World War?
In conclusion, why is the UK trying to block Russia from calling a meeting of the UN Security Council, to discuss these reports and narratives? Why does Gleb Bazov say (below) this performance by the UK is “in worst British tradition?” This appears to be a clear reference to US and UK support for Hitler. As Sergey Glazyev has written:
In Europe, the corporate governance system was formed, unfortunately, according to the Nazi model in Germany, and also not without the help of British intelligence. Hitler, backed by British intelligence agencies and American capital, quickly deployed a centralized corporate governance system in Germany, which allowed the Third Reich to quickly take over all of Europe.
This is a complicated and little known historical topic among the general public in the West, although well enough known among specialist historians. It is generally accepted by Russians—thus Bazov:
Shutting down public discourse? Is that part of our values now? Apparently the answer is, Yes. This refusal should be a huge tell for thinking persons. After all, the physical site of the supposed crime is held by Ukraine, not Russia. Yet Russia wants to talk about it. The process of international forensic investigation is well known and established. This doesn’t smell right.
Stephen McIntyre
@ClimateAudit
“Yesterday, in worst British tradition, #UK government refused consent to call a meeting of #UN Security Council to discuss situation in #Bucha.
On what principled grounds does Britain refuse consent to discuss a controversy being used to escalate Ukraine war?
From allegations to trial--what's missing? Oh yeah--an impartial investigation!
"Biden says killings in Bucha are "outrageous," calls for war crimes trial against Putin."